Freshening up on Lithic Analysis

Just recently I joined a CRM company here in Rochester, and found out  this morning that I’ll be starting out on my first site next week! Therefore I decided to take a brief walk through the basics of lithic analysis (since I haven’t studied stone materials since I finished my BA in Cultural Anthropology in the spring of 2012).

In this post, I decided to share some of the more helpful sites I came across, in my mission to re-orient myself within the world of projectile points, flakes and debitage.

First of all, I found an article entitled “Recognizing Artifacts” that provides a rather good, (although certainly dated) introduction to various elements of stone tool recognition, these including percussion methods (direct and indirect), stone abrasion, drilling, and flaking, general uses of stone tools, and basic projectile typology. You can access “Recognizing Artifactshere. A good accompaniment for this article is another entitled “Procedures for Lithic Analysis,” which provides a very necessary explanation of the physics behind the breakage (or knapping) of stone tools. You can access that article here.
fig0302
After refreshing my memory of the basics of flint knapping and stone tool analysis, I looked into the specific sorts of projectile points and stone tools likely to be found in the New York area. This site for the New York State Museum’s archaeological collections is a great resource for viewing the various types of projectile points found within their collection, (the list on the left of the page). Check it out here. This site also has a good introduction to typology, which you can view here.

oneotaLithics
I also found this site, (ProjectilePoints.net) to be a good visual resource for searching specific features of projectile points. You can access the site here.

Also important is a general understanding of the various cultural periods in Native American Chronologies. These roughly include the following, and each present their own recognizable lithic assemblages.

  • PALEOINDIAN
    8000 BCE – 14,000 BCE
  • ARCHAIC
    1800 BCE – 8000 BCE
  • TRANSITIONAL
    (Terminal Archaic)
    1200 BCE- 1800 BCE
  • EARLY AND MIDDLE WOODLAND
    1200 BCE – 800 CE
  • LATE WOODLAND
    (Late Prehistoric)
    800 CE – 1550 CE

Anyways, this was just a brief look at the basics of Lithic analysis and a few useful sites in case anyone else is interested. I will definitely try to post consistent updates of my work in the field of CRM, so stay tuned! Also there will be a similar post later in the week when I refresh my memory of ceramics.

Further Reading:
Recognizing Artifacts
 Procedures for Lithic Analysis
New York State Museum Projectile Point Collection

Advertisements

7 responses to “Freshening up on Lithic Analysis

  1. Having read this I believed it was rather enlightening.
    I appreciate you finding the time and effort to put this informative article together.
    I once again find myself personally spending a lot of time both reading and leaving
    comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  2. I blog quite often and I genuinely appreciate your information.
    This article has really peaked my interest. I will book mark your blog
    and keep checking for new details about once per week.

    I opted in for your RSS feed as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s